Process of oxidizing mixture of microcrystalline wax and two polyethylenes of different molecular weight, and product produced thereby



I M h 1959 M. DE GROOTE ET AL 2,879,239

PROCESS OE OXIDIZING MIXTURE OF MICROCRYSTALLINE AND TWO POLYETHYLENES OF DIFFERENT MOLECULAR V WEIGHT, AND PRODUCT PRODUCED THEREBY Filed March 10, 1955 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 WAX CONVENTIONAL POLYETHYLENE HAVINGA MOLECULAR WEIGHT BETWEEN |2,000 8.32900 TANK BOTTOM DERIVED MICROCRYSTALLINE LOW MOLAL POLYETHYLENE WAX HAVING A CARBON ATOM RANGE OF FREE FROM OXYGENATED RADICAL APPROXIMATELY 35 TO I00 HAVING A MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF APPROXIMATELY 2,000

FIG. I I

- MNVENTORS March 24, 1959 M'. DE GROOTE ET AL I 2,879,239

nrzmc MIXTURE OF MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX ECULAR PROCESS OF OXI AND TWO POLYETHYLENES OF DIFFERENT MOL WEIGHT, AND PRODUCT PRODUCED THEREBY Filed March 10, 1955 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 OPEN-NIP o o O o 3 a In HOURS ROLLING ISO'C.

FIG.2

HOURS 7 ROLLING I60C.

FIG. 3

INVENTORS March 24, 1959 M. DE GROOTE ET AL PROCESS OF OXIDIZING MIXTURE O5 MICROCRYSTALLINE AND TWO POLYETHYLENES OF DIFFERENT MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND PRODUCT PRODUCED THEREBY 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 Filed March 10, 1955 WAX (I) LI] (0 U m 0 LIQUIDS in o N 3% Mum's-mum I l I0,000 20,000 MOLECULAR WEIGHT (SQUARE ROOT SCALE) (s2: ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, KIRK- OTHMER) voL.|o, PAGE 94L FIG 4 United States Patent PROCESS OF OXIDIZING MIXTURE F MICRO- CRYSTALLINE WAX AND TWO POLYETHYL- ENES OF DIFFERENT MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND PRGDUCT PRODUCED THEREBY Melvin De Groote, University City, and Franklin E.

Mange, Clayton, M0., assignors to PetroliteCorporation, Wilmington, Del.-, a corporation of Delaware- Application March 10, 1955, Serial No. 493,463 8 Claims. (Cl. 260'-28.5)-

The present invention is concerned with a process of oxidizing a three-component mixture consisting of (A) refined tank bottom-derived microcryst'all-ine wax having acarbon atom range ofapproximately 35 to 100; said wax being characterized by the following characteristics;

(an) oxidation susceptible in conventional gaseous oxygen: containing oxidation procedure; (1212)" immiscible with polystyrene of molecular weight range 5,000 to 10,000 at approximately 160 C., and (cc) has not been rendered oxidation susceptible by subjecting to treatment with amember of the class consisting of a metallic halide, hydrochloric acid and chlorinated hydrocarbon; (B) alow molal polyethylene having a molecular weight of ap-' proximately 2000 said polyethylene being free from oxygenated terminal groups; said polyethylene having a melting point of 97 to 106 C. A specific gravity or approximately .92, a hardness of less than .5 based on penetration measured in millirnete'rs at" 77 F. witha 100 gram weight for seconds; (C) a-nori'nal' commercial polyethylene defined by the small shaded'rectangular band" of Figure 4; in such weight proportions so that the average composition of said initial reactants lies approximately within the parallelogram-A, B, C,D, of the accompanying drawing, Figure 1; said oxidation comprising treatment with an oxygen-containing gas in presence of not over 2% of a conventional oxidation-promoting catalyst at a temperature sufficiently above the boiling point of water for a periodof time in gas flow rate to cause formation of- (a) hydroxyl containingmolecules; (b) carboxyl containingmolecules;followed by (c) esteri-' fication, and (d) subsequent reactions including at least one of the following, alcoholysis and esterinterchange; said resultant product having an acid number of not less than 12, and a saponification number of not less than 3'5 and having a combined oxygen content of not less than 2%. g

A variety of hydrocarbon Waxes and comparable compounds principally hydrocarbon in nature have been subject'ed to oxidation in various manners and particularly by the use of air, ozone or oxygen in the presence of an oxidation catalyst, such as a wax soluble organic salt, such as manganese or cobalt naphthenate. v d

The waxes employed for oxidation may be obtained by various procedures; for instance, they may be obtained in processes involving the production of lubricating-oil, or in processes conducted primarily for the recovery of wax; or they may be obtained from sediment in crude oil itself, i.e. commonly referred to as tank bottoms?" ploying (a) a specific typeof microcry'stalline wax de- 2,819,239 Patented Mar. 24, 1969 2 rived from tankbottomsas dilfe'rentiated from the broad class, (b) conventional high molal polyethylene having a molecular weight in the rangeof 12,000 to 32,000, and (c) a certain type of low' molal polyethylene having a molecular weight of approximately 2000 and differentiated from a wide variety of polyethylenes broadly which are higher in molecular weight and also dilterentiated for that matter from lower molecular weight polyethylenes which are grease-like in character, this latter differentiation being characterized by hardness or reference to penetration.

The-recovery and production of microcrystalline wax is well known and has been described in the literature. See, for example, US. Patent No. 2,443,840, dated June 22, 1948, to Stossell Recovery of tank bottom waxes is conducted principally in the middle western oil fields, in Kansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Tex-as as well 'as elsewhere to a lesser degree. Thedifferen'ce'in tank bottom waxes can be illustrated by reference to those found in a single State, to Ma -Texas. The composition of tank bottom waxes has been-approximately determined. In each instance the tank bottom Wax is a mixture" principally of hydrocar bon material containing perhaps atrace of some other element in: chemical combination, not infrequently oxygen,- and sometimes nitrogen and sulphur. Although there usually i's'only a' trace of elements other than carbon and hydrogen yet-such trace in combination with a molecular having 35 to 100 carbon atoms may actually have significance which somewhat obscure and subtle.

' Althou'gh'the tank bottom waxes are largely parafiinic in nature one cannot necessarily rule out the fact that a molecule having 35 to100carbon atoms may or may not have some other structure such as an aryl structure or more likely analicyclic structure. 7

Even in light of what has been said previously there is no explanation for afact that hasbeen recognized for: years;- to wit, that microcrystal line waxes, and for that matter one could limit oneself to those found in Texas, fall into two classes; one class consists of oxidationsusceptiblernicrocrystalline waxes which'can be oxidized readily using a conventional catalyst and using a well known procedure sueh'as' the kind described in the article entitled Oxidation of Paraflins, by Dr. Ernest Stossel, which appeared inthe" Oil and Gas Journal, issues of July 21*, August 18, and September 1, 1945; Theother' class of microcrystalline waxes appears to be identical in most respects but for some reason these are not oxidation susceptible by conventional means. They are just as valuable for many purposes as the'oxidation-susceptible waxes and" for some purposes perhaps even more valuable.

Purely for purposes of illustration, immediately following and identifiedas Table I, is a table showing oxidation of the West Texa's'microcryst'alline wax (non-oxidation-susceptible), the oxidation of an East Texas microcrystalline wax (oxidation susceptible), and the oxidation of an'aluminum'chlor'ide treated West Texas-microcrystalline wax, all three waxes being oxidized under the same" As has'beenpointed out elsewhere, one can select two" difierent microcrystalline waxes, both obtained fromtank" bottoms and both possibly obtained from the same state,

for instance, from various Texas oil fields, which are characterized by substantially the same physical properties by conventional measurements. However, from the standpoint of oxidation susceptibility by means of gaseous oxidation it is found that one class is non-susceptible and the other one is susceptible. The non-susceptible type of wax when reacted with aluminum chloride or other halides, such as hydrochloric acid, or certain Friedel- Crafts catalysts, becomes oxidation susceptible. The above aluminum chloride treatment was accomplished by heating for approximately 7 hours at 100 C. The amount of aluminum chloride used was Lesser amounts can be used. Such treatment has been described in the patent literature.

The present invention is concerned with the use of oxidation susceptible microcrystalline waxes derived from tank bottoms and preferably the oxidation susceptible microcrystalline waxes from tank bottoms as found in the East Texas oil fields. As has been pointed out it is not known whether oxidation is prevented by the presence of a naturally occurring anti-oxidant or whether some other cause is involved. In some instances non-oxidation susceptible waxes, particularly of the kind derived from West Texas, can be rendered oxidation susceptible by vigorous treatment with a metallic chloride which apparently causes some obscure change, the character of which is not known.

As to the treatment of microcrystalline wax with aluminum chloride or the like, see US. Patent No. 2,471,102 to Fish.

Having selected an oxidation susceptible wax of the kind above described, it is to be noted for the present purpose it must meet another requirement. Certain microcrystalline waxes derived in the conventional manner apparently mix with a large variety of olefin polymers at their melting point or somewhat above, for instance, 160 C. For instance, one such polymer is polystyrene. We have used the lowest molecular weight of polystyrene available from a commercial source as a screening test to select the appropriate tank bottom wax. Our method of screening is as follows: Wemix 5 grams of polystyrene (5000 or 10,000 molecular weight) with 95 grams of the microcrystalline wax and if after stirring for 4 hours at 160 C. one does not obtain a homogeneous mixture the wax is satisfactory for use in the present invention. If one does obtain a homogeneousmixture the wax is not suitable for the present invention.

Reference has been made to pre-treatment with a metallic salt, particularly a metallic halide such'as, for example, aluminum chloride. Chlorinated hydrocarbons and particularly chlorinated parafiin has been suggested for this purpose. Hydrochloric acid is sometimes satisfactory for the same purpose.

In the hereto appended claims the wax employed is characterized by the following characteristics: (a) oxidation susceptible in a conventional procedure; (b) immiscible with polystyrene 5000 or 10,000 molecular weight at approximately 160 C. and (c) not been sub jected to treatment with a metallic halide hydrochloric acid or a chlorine containing hydrocarbon compound.

The present invention includes the use of a polyethylene. Polyethylenes cover a variety of products running in molecular weights from 1,000 to almost 100,000. The bulk of those sold in commerce range from 15,000 to 25,000 molecular weight. There are certain low molal polyethylenes having a molecular weight in the range of 1,000 to 5,000.

There are at least three classes of low molal polyethylenes, i.e., those around a molecular weight of approximately 2000. In one class there is a-terminal hydroxyl group present; in another group, there is. a terminal carboxyl group, and in the class employed in the present invention the low molal polyethylene is free from any oxygenated terminal group, i.e., free from either a carboxyl group or-a'hydroxyl group. Furthermore, the

low molal polyethylenes herein employed are distinguished by their hardness from the somewhat similar products having greaselike characteristics and a molecular weight of approximately 1500.

For purpose of convenience, what is said hereinafter will be divided into six parts:

Part 1 is concerned with suitable tank bottom derived microcrystalline wax;

Part 2 is concerned with the conventional high molal polyethylene;

Part 3 is concerned with the low molal polyethylenes free from any terminally oxygenated radical and described in detail elsewhere;

Part 4 is concerned with the limits of the components in the mixtures employed;

Part 5 is concerned with gaseous oxidation of the mixture and for convenience is divided into two sections; Section A is concerned with operative steps as the procedure'is actually conducted, and Section B is concerned with the consideration of the probable reactions involved; and m Part6 is concerned with uses for the products derived in the manner described in Part 5, preceding.

PART 1 i The parafiin wax employed in the present invention is characterized by being obtained from tank bottoms in the conventional manner. The procedure for recovery of such waxes is well known and materials are presently paraffin, or the like, to render it oxidation susceptible.v

- Generally speaking, the melting point of such waxes prior amber.

to oxidation is within the range of 150 to 200 F. The preferred range for the present purpose is a wax that melts at approximately within the range of 190 to 195 F. The color may vary from a pale straw to dark Our preferenceis to use the lighter colored waxes such as would approximate pale amber, yellow, or straw, in color.

PART 2 High molal polyethylenes within themolecular weight range of 12,000 to 32,000 are marketed by a number of organizations have been fully described in the literature. The various high molal polyethylenes may vary somewhatin respect to hardness, softening point, etc. The variation is largely one of physical properties from a standpoint of molding polyethylene which is its most important use. There is no evidence that high molal polyethyleneincludes either a hydroxyl group or a carboxyl group in the molecule or if it does it is not detectable by the usual methods of examination. It is well known that in numerous-cases such high molal polyethylenes do contain a trace of oxygen although themanner in which the oxygen is combined is not completely understood.

As to a more complete description of these polyethylenes suitable for the present purpose, reference is made to Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, volume 10, page 938 et seq. Note the following statement which appears on page 940:

' A number of physical and mechanical properties are directly atfected by the crystallinity and hence by the degree of branching. Examples are hardness, softening point, and yield point in tension. On the other hand, some properties, such as tensile strength, flexibility at low temperatures, and impact strength are principally a function of the average molecular weight. The wide range of types of polyethylene is a reflection of the wide variation in molecular weight and in degree of branching, and hence in crystallinity, which can be covered by alterations in the polymerization conditions. The interrelation of chain length crystallinity, and the nature of the polymer is Shown in (Figure 4 hereto attached). The normal commercial polyethylenes, whose properties are described in the subsequent sections, lie within the small shaded band in the center of the diagram.

In light of the above it seems the clearest description of the polyethylene of the kind herein described is by reference to the shaded band of rectangular area of Figure 4 which, as previously stated, is the Figure 1 referred to in the excerpt above.

PART 3 Low molal polyethylenes of the kind herein described can be obtained in a number of difierent ways. One procedure is to use a comparable low molal polyethylene of the kind described in U.S. Patent 2,504,400, dated April 18, 1950, to Erchak. See, also, US. Patent 2,698,309, dated December 28, 1954, to Thwaite et al. Such hydroxylated polyethylenes can be dehydrogenated by the usual procedure eliminating the mole of water and introducing an unsaturated linkage. such or preferably subjected to hydrogenation so that in essence one obtains the low molal polyethylene free from any oxygen containing terminal radical.

Some processes involving the polymerization of polyethylene are conducted so it well may be this actually does take place and the hydroxylated product, for example, is not removed at any stage.

However, such products in which there is no separation of a hydroxylated polyethylene can be obtained by the procedure described in U-.S. Patent No. 2,683,141, dated July 6, 1954, to Erchak.

For convenience we have found that products commercially available are perfectly satisfactory and prefer to use these available materials.

Average Molecular Weight Melting Point, C Hardness 1 Specific Gravity 1 Measured by penetration in milliliters as described elsewhere.

PART 4 Example 1a To 300 grams of microcrystalline wax (190-l95 F. melting point) obtained by refining the tank bottom residue from preferably East Texas crudes, is added 68 grams of high molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 20,000) and 32 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average molecular weight 2,000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene grade A previously described). The resultant mixture is heated to approximately 320 F. for 2 hours at which time a homogeneous blend is obtained. When a portion of this material is allowed to cool to room temperature there appears to be no separation of any of the constituent materials. This material is very had and forms firm hard gels in turpentine, mineral spirits and other hydrocarbon solvents.

Example 2a To 256 grams ofmicrocrystalline wax (l90195 F. melting point) is added 96 grams of high molal poly- Such products can be used as 6 ethylene (average molecular weight approximately 22,000) and 48 grams of low molal; polyethylene (average molecular weight 2,000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene grade B previously-described). .The. result? ant mixture is heated to approximately 320 F. for '2 hours at which time a homogeneous mixtureis obtained which shows no separation of constituents,.when cooled down. In this and other examples these materials can be blended at alower temperature, for instance, 280 F. and lower but it will take a longer time to effect solution. At a higher temperature, for example, 350 F. solution can be efiected in a shorter time with possibly some breakdown in the polymer chain.

Exan zple 3a Example 4a v To 272 grams of a microcrystalline wax 1(190-195" F melting point) is added 96 grams of a high molal poly ethylene (average molecular weight approximately 19.,- 000) and 32 grams of a low molal polyethylene. (average molecular Weight approximately 2000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene Grade B previously described). The resultant mixture is heated to approximately 320 F. for 2 hours, at which time a homogeneous mixture is obtained which shows no separation of constituents when cooled down to room-temperature.

Example 5a To 296 grams of a microcrystalline wax (l75 F, melting point) is added 68 grams of a high molal poly ethylene (average molecular weight approximately 30,- 000) and 36 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average molecular Weight approximately 2000 of the type ex+ emplified by polyethylene Grade A previously described); The resultant mixture is heated to about 320 F. for 2 hours at which time a homogeneous mixture is obtained which shows no separation of constituents when cooled down to room temperature.

Example 6a To 280 grams of a microcrystalline wax (190-195 F. melting point) is added 80 grams of ahigh molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 14,000) and 40 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 2000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene Grade B previously described). The resultant mixture is heated to about 320 F. for 2 hours at which time a homogeneous mixture is obtained which shows no separation of constituents when cooled down to room temperature.

Example 7a To 280 grams of a microcrystalline wax (-190 F. melting point) is added 76 grams of a high molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 25,000) and 44 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 25,000) and 44 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average molecular weight approximately 2000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene Grade A previously described). The resultant product is heated to approximately 320 F. for 2 hours at which time a homogeneous mixture is obtained which shows no separation of constituentswhen cooled down to room temperature.

Example "8a To' 264 grams of a microcrystalline wax (BO-195 F. melting point) is added 88 grams of'a high 'molal polyethylene (averagemolecular weight approximately 17,000) and 48 grams of a low molal polyethylene (average-molecular weight approximately 2000 of the type exemplified by polyethylene Grade B previously de scribed). The resultant mixture is heated to approximately 320 F. for 2 hours at which time a homogeneous mixture is obtained which shows no separation of constituents when cooled down to'room temperature.

PART 5.

This part is concerned with the gaseous oxidation of mixtures which have been described in Part 4, preceding. This part will be divided into two sections, Section A dealing with illustrative examples and Section B concemed with the possible reactions which are involved. I

SECTION A Example 1b To-the product of Example 1a is added 2 grams of cobalt naphthenate. The resultant mixture is blown with air at a rate of 5 m1./ g./ min. until the product shows an acid number of 16. This latter step requires normally about 65 hours but this lengthy time can be considerably reduced by the use of oxygen enriched air or pure oxygen. The product of this example is a light orange color, is easily cmulsifiable and has a penetration of 2 as measured by the procedure outlined by the A.S.T.M. test method D5-25, using a 100 g. weight and a temperature of 25 C. Example 212 To; the product obtained from Example 2a is added 2 grams of manganese naphthenate. The mixture is heated to 270 F. and air is blown through at a rate of 5 ml./g./min., maintaining the temperature at 260-280 F. until an acid number of about 25 is obtained. The average time required is about 75 hours. It has been found that it is not necessary to add all the polyethylene before the air is turned on and inlfact it is often of advantage when higher percentages of polyethylene are used, especially of the high molal type, to add part of it after the oxidation has progressed for, say 8 hours. The same. product is obtained using a wax-insoluble catalyst such as potassium permanganate (introduced as an aqueous solution) instead of the manganese naphthenate. The product of this example is an orange color and is very hard, having a penetration value of between one and two as measured by the A.S.T.M. Test Method D5-25. It has a saponification number of between 60 and 75 and may be easily emulsified by the procedure described in Part 6 of this application to give a stable emulsion in water, which emulsion upon drying, will give a hard tough and glossy film.

Example 3b To the product from Example 3a is added 2 grams of manganese stearate. After this mixture is heated to 300 F. air is introduced at a rateof approximately 5 ml./g./min. until an acid number of about 10 is obtained (about 40 hours). The temperature is then reduced to 240-250" F. and the oxidation is continued until the acid number reaches approximately 17 (about hours) By the use of this procedure a light orange, hard, emulsifiable wax is obtained having a saponification value of 45-55. If this oxidation reaction is run at a temperature of 260280 F. rather than starting the oxidation at a higher temperature and then lowering it, a product is obtained having a lower saponification to acid number ratio. Although this latter product can be emulsified to give a-stable emulsion with very desirable properties, a wax having a higher saponification to acid number ratio may be more readily emulsified with water.

Example 4b When the procedure of Example 2b is employedusing the product from Example 4a with 2 grams of manganese naphthenate, an orange colored product is obtained that has a penetration of one as measured by the A.S.T.M. Test'Method D5-25 when it has been oxidized to an acid number of 15 and a sapon'ification number of between 35-45. The time required for this reaction is from 60 to hours.

SECTION B The present invention is concerned with the resultant obtained by reactions of the kind specified in regard to a tertiary mixture, onecomponent being tank bottomderived microcrysta'll'inewaxes and preferably derived from East Texas crude along with two different polyethylenes. There are a number of suitable references which indicate as far as the oxidizing of tank bottom waxes goes, when oxidation takes place under conditions herein described that there is considerable change as, for example, conversion so the product shows an acid number of 30, a saponification number of 90, along with a combined oxygen content of approximately 5%. Obviously there are formed alcohols, and then acids and then esters, although this is an over-simplification which does not take into consideration other products which might be formed. For instance, reference is made to U.S. Patent No. 2,128,523 dated August 30, 1938, to Bur-1 well. In discussing the oxidation of waxes under con-. ditions akin to those herein employed with certain modifications there is stated the following:

The process above described is that disclosed in Patent Nos. 1,690,768 and 1,690,769, granted .to Arthur W. Burwell. The resulting reaction product is a mixture of a great number of different compounds which may, for clarity, be grouped thus:

(l) Unoxidized (i.e., original) hydrocarbons;

(2) Aliphatic alcohols, largely secondary and tertiary;

(3) Aliphatic ketones;

(4) Ketoalcohols;

(5) High molecular weight saturated aliphatic carboxylic and hydroxycarboxylic acids; etc.; and

(6) Neutral, esters and lactones derived from the aforesaid acids and the aforesaid alcohols, or from the aforesaid acids, respectively.

Differently grouped, the mixtures are separable broadly, into (a) saponifiables and (b) unsaponifiables: into the latter group fall the alcoholic and ketonic compounds aforesaid (and, of course, the unoxidized hydrocarbons), whereas the acids, esters and lactones are grouped as saponifiables.

Normally in the oxidation of conventional polyethylene particularly polyethylene having a molecular weight in excess of 12,000 and most characteristically a polyethylene of the kind that is commonly used in wax compounds, such as polyethylene of the 12,000 to 32,000 molecular weight range, one finds that the same reactions take place along with other reactions to wit, polymerization, extensive oxidative degradation or depolymerization or the equivalent. We are inclined to think that the initial attack occurs at a tertiary or secondary position so as to eventually form alcohols and then these are further oxidized with rupture of the polyethylene molecule to form acids or other oxidation products which may again be further'degraded by similar means. In other words, in oxidation of a polyethylene having a molecular weight in the 12,000 to 32,000 range, there is no question but what in the final stages, and perhaps after considerable change in color, one does obtain products in which, to a large extent and perhaps entirely, the initial structural units represent products having a molecular weight in the neighborhood of 4,000, 3,000 of 2,000, or less, i.e., the polyethylene unit seems to be degraded into a number of smaller molecules.

As to the oxidation of polyethylene reference is made to Midwinter, British Plastics, May 1945, pp. 208-214 and 228. For purpose of convenience, two drawings appearing in the article are herewith produced as Figures 2 and 3. As stated in the article, the figures herein identified as 2 and 3 show the effect of milling polyethylene in air at 160- C. Both power factor and fluidity show very marked changes when polyethylene is rolled with a tight nip and constantly changing surface (good mixing), but no appreciable differences are noted when polyethylene is rolled with an open nip so that the movement of the bank between the rolls is reduced to a minimum (poor mixing).

Reference is made to the pamphlet Alkathene which is the brand of polyethylene marketed by the Plastics Division of Imperial Chemical Industries Limited. The reference to Alkathene has no significance other than that it is a reference to a polyethylene of the conventional type having molecular weight range from approximately 12,000 to 32,000. The statement is as follows:

When Alkathene is processed in air below 125 C. for periods up to about eight hours, its physical and electrical properties are scarcely afiected, but at higher temperatures, or after a longer time, oxidation occurs.

Oxidation causes an increase of power factor and an increase or decrease in fluidity, sometimes accompanied by discoloration. Thus, heating in limited amounts of oxygen causes cross-linking of polymer molecules and, therefore, a toughening of the product to a rubber-like mass. On the other hand, having in excess oxygen in volves molecular degradation and a decrease in melt viscosity.

In mill mixing the rate of oxidation increases with increase in the temperature and the rate of shear in the mp.

It is very questionable that oxidation as herein conducted on a binary mixture of tank bottom-derived wax and high molal polyethylene would produce a composite in which there were comparatively small units having 50 to 75 carbon atoms derived from the wax and large units having perhaps 1200 carbon atoms derived from the polyethylene. This does not mean that trans-esterification or 'esterification could not take place, at least theoretically; between the acids of the wax and the alcohols of the high polymer molecule; or, inversely, between the acids of the high molal polyethylene and the alcohols of. the low molal wax but there is the reaction which probably takes place at an intermediate point, to wit, the break down or cleavage of the polyethylene (probably:

after hydroxylation) and thus a mixture if one proceeded as herein described omitting the low molal polyethylene (thepolyethylene having a molecular weight of 200.0 or thereabouts) would actually result, at least to a substan-' tial degree and perhaps ent rely in mixed esters derived from the low molal wax and the polyethylene obtained by oxidative degradation .or depol-ymerization, i.e., deg-. radation polymer units having a molecular weight in. the neighborhood of 2,000 to 4,000.

When a three-compon-ent system, to wit, a tank-bottom refined wax, a high molal polyethylene and a'low molal polyethylene, is subjected to oxidation conditions we ob-- tain a product which. has more desirable properties than that obtained from the binary system just beforehand: mentioned.

-In the present instance one is oxidizing a micro-crystalline wax having a molecular weight of approximately 500 to 1400 (35 to carbon atoms). One is also oxidizing a low molal polyethylene having a molecular weight of approximately 2000 (approximately -145 carbon atoms) and a higher molecular weight polyethylene which in a general way is apt to have at least ten times this number of carbon atoms, for instance, 1400 to 1500 as a minimum. Since the low molal polyethyl ene does not contain an oicygenatedgmup which can enterinto reaction by esterification or the like fragmenless simultaneously and thus the result of oxidation is,

aproduct differentiated from those comparable--proce-' dures in which the polyethylene contains a terminal oxy genated radical. See our co-pending applications, Serials Nos. 493,461 and 493,462, both filed March- 10; 1,955.

The difierentation resides, of course, primary in the fact that the polyethylene included is a low molalpolyf ethylene along with a high molal polyethylene and this is emphasized in Figure 4 hereto attached. Stated another way, if one were to attempt to replace the low molal polyethylene with the high molal polyethylene, i.e., oxidize a two-component system instead of a threecomponent system, one would not obtain the products having the characteristics and advantages of the endproducts herein described.

The products herein obtained as far as we are aware involve a procedure not suggested previously elsewhere. Emphasis appears to be indicated in regard to what has been just said, not so much from the standpoint of difi'er entiating from other processes, but rather to ofier some explanation, whether logical or speculative, as to why the herein described procedure gives products of unusual value for numerous purposes. The reason for this is the following: (a) We use two different polyethylenes, one being high molal and one low molal; (b) as far. as we know no one has suggested previously the oxidation of a: polyethylene having a molecular weight of 2000 or there-, aboutsalone; (c) over-and above this the total amount of polyethylene employed is not such small amount; or. small ratio as is sometimes employed but is a substantial amount, for instance, approximately one-quarter as much or more of the amount of wax employed; (d) we do not find we can replace the polyethylene with other polymers, such as vinyl polymers, butadiene polymers, bntylene polymers, or the likethe properties obtained seem to be obtainable from polyethylene only; (e) desirable properties of the kind hereinafter described seem to be limited to an extremely narrow combination, i.e. the initial reaction mixture which comes within the area of the parallelogram in Figure 1; (f) finally, so far as we are aware no such combination as specified above has been subjected, not merely to bare oxidation or minimum oxidation but to controlled oxidation so as to obtain a final product having an acid number of at least 12, a saponification number of at least 35, and combined oxygen content of not less than 2%. The upper limit for the acid number is approximately 35; for the saponification number approximately 90, and for the combined oxygen content approximately 7%.

Numerous catalysts may be successfully employed in this invention to effect oxidation. In general these cat alysts are composed of salts of the transition metals and,

more specifically, salts of cobalt, manganese and. iron. We prefer to use wax soluble catalysts of these elements, such as the naphthenate, stearate, oleate, etc. Another very effective catalyst is potassium permanganate. This material is wax insoluble and it is best to add it in the form of an aqueous solution and then allow the water to evaporate from the wax mixture. v

The mixture composed of microcrystalline wax, high molecular weight polyethylene and low molecular weight polyethylene is oxidized by an oxygen-containing gas in this invention. We normally employ air because of 'convenience. However, oxygen, or air enriched with oxygen, will give a gas which would work equally as well. We have noted that when a gas high in oxygen content is employed, the oxidation proceeds at a much more rapid rate and'as a result a lower gas rate can be em ployed. Ozone can be added to the oxygen-containinggases which aids in the oxidation procedure. I What is said. herein as to the initial component mixtures which is subjected to drastic oxidation it may be 11 noted-thatsuch mixture can be combined with small amounts of certain other wax-soluble polymers mentioned elsewhere, such as paracoumarone resin, indene resin, terpene resin, or the like, to give analogous products. .Note that in such instance neither type of polyethylene (high molal or low molal) can be replaced by some other polymer but some other polymer in comparatively small amounts, for instance, .4% up to 5% may be added and at least in some instances give somewhat modified properties. Such four-component combination is not part of the present invention.

Similarly, another four-component combination, which is not part of the present invention, involves the use of a polybutylene and particularly one which is a solid at ordinary room temperatures. Such solid polybutylenes' have either one or 'both of two characteristics, i.e., a stickiness or, tackiness and, secondly, a rubbery body. Actually, we have prepared produCts. using a.four-component system i.e., those above enumerated along with solid polybutylene in small amounts, for instance, 1% to 5% by weight of the total mix andthe resultant prod uct gives excellent floor polishes which, in addition to the usual desirable qualities was particularly valuable from the standpoint that it seemed to be slip-proof.

PART 6 100 grams of an oxidized product of this invention and 12 grams of oleic acid are blended with agitation and to this blend at 200-205" F. are added 7.6 grams of morpholine. Water at ZOO-210 F. is at first added very slowly to the above blend kept at 200-210" F. First'a heavy gel forms which inverts to the oil-in-water type of emulsion and at this time the rate of water addition can beincreased. To make an emulsion containing 12% solids, 816 grams of water should be used in this pro- To this emulsion should be added 5% to 10%" cedure. of a 12% ammoniacal shellac solution (or a comparable material) to improve the leveling properties of the emulsron.

It may be necessary to vary the proportions of the emulsifying agents depending upon to what extent the polyethylene wax blends are oxidized. This emulsion also can be made by the wax to-water method although the resultant emulsion is not as good.

In addition, various other ingredients may be used in these emulsions as synthetic resins, such as those obtainable on the open market and recognized for this use by the trade, or various vegetable waxes.

Example 20 25 grams of the product of this invention, 25 grams of an oxidized microcrystalline wax produced by several manufacturers (180-185 F. melting point, 4-6 penetration, 4-5 N.P.A. color, 2025 acid 'number,and 55-64 saponification number), 25 grams of a phenol-terpene resin of the type used by fioor polish manufacturers, 25 Q grams of carnauba wax and 10 grams of oleic acid, are;

heated together at temperatures up to 250 F., until a solution is obtained. The mixture is cooled to 210 F. with agitation. 7.2 grams of Z-amino-Z-methyl-l-propanol are added with stirring at 200 to 210 F., followed irn-v mediately by addition of 4 grams of borax in a saturated solution. This mixture is heated at 200 to 210F. for five minutes and then the melt is slowly poured into' emulsion has smoothed out a 12%v solution of leveling agent is added with agitation.

These finished emulsions can be spread on a surface such as linoleum, to give a finish which dries to 'a high gloss without bufiing. This wax film is hard and tough and as a result is resistant to scufiing. i

The wax products of the invention may be used in other emulsions such as those used for furniture or automobile polishes to give hard glossy films.

Because of the high melting point and good hardness of the products of this patent application these waxes are also valuable for additives to other waxes to impart to varying extents these desirable characteristics.

These wax materials also find use as additives to lubricating greases or as additives in various hydrocarbon coatings formetals where, in addition to enhancing the physical properties, they also have a tendency to inhibit corrosion.

The percentage of oxygen as reported in the invention is best determined by a carbon and hydrogen analysis. Since these oxidized materials are essentially composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, the percentage of oxygen is equal to minus the sum of the percent of carbon and hydrogen. There will be, of course, a trace of other materials such as that contributed by the metal catalyst (approximately 0.05%), metals from the reac-' tion vessel (these contribute less than 0.01%) and other elements such as nitrogen and sulfur (usually less than 0.01%). An approximate value for the percentage of oxygen can be calculated by using the saponification number, hydroxyl value, and carbonyl value. Most of the oxygen is in the form of acids and esters, so an idea of the oxygen content can be determined from the saponifica'tion value.

Having thus described our invention, what we claim as new and desire to obtain by Letters Patent, is:

l. The process of oxidizing a three-component mixture consisting of (A) refined tank bottom-derived microcrystalline wax having a carbon atom range of approximately 35 to 100; said wax being characterized by the following characteristics; (aa) oxidation susceptible in conventional gaseous oxygen-containing oxidation procedure; (bb) immiscible with polystyrene of molecular weight range 5,000 to 10,000 at approximately 160 C., and (cc) has not been rendered oxidation susceptible by subjecting to treatment with a member of the class consisting of a metallic halide, hydrochloric acid and chlorinated hydrocarbon; (B) a low molal polyethylene having a, molecular weight of approximately 2000; said polyethylene being free of oxygenated terminal groups, said polyethylene being produced by polymerizing ethylene under 425-475 atmospheres at temperatures between 200 C. in the presence of isopropanol and a peroxide; followed by dehydration; (C) a normal commercial polyethylene defined by the small shaded rectangular band of Figure 4; in said weight proportions so that the average composition of said initial reactants lies approximately within the parallelogram A, B, C, D, of the accompanying drawing, Figure 1; said oxidation comprising oxidizing with an oxygen-containing gas in presence of not over 2% of a conventional oxidation-promoting catalyst at a'ternperature above 212 F. within the range of about 240 F. to 300 F. for a period of time of about 55 to about 75 hours in gas flow rate to cause formation of (a) hydroxyl containing molecules; (b) carboxyl containing molecules; followed by (.c) esterification, and (d) subsequent reactions including at least one of the following, alcoholysis and ester-interchange; said resultant product having an acid number of not less than 12, and a saponification number of not less than 35, and having a combined oxygen content of not less than 2%.

2. The product obtained by the process defined in. claim 1.

3. The process of oxidizing a three-component water at 200 to 210 F. with rapid agitation. Wh en,the, consisting of (A) refined tank bottom-derivedmierw;

crystalline wax having a carbon atom range of approximately to 100; said wax being characterized by the following characteristics; (aa) oxidation-susceptible in conventional gaseous oxygen-containing oxidation procedure; (bb) immiscible with polystyrene of molecular weight range 5,000 to 10,000 at approximately 160 C., and (cc) has not been rendered oxidation susceptible by subjecting to treatment with a member of the class consisting of a metallic halide, hydrochloric acid and chlorinated hydrocarbon; (B) a low molal polyethylene having a molecular weight of approximately 2000; said polyethylene being free of oxygenated terminal groups, said polyethylene being produced by polymerizing ethylene under 425-475 atmospheres at temperatures between 140-200 C. in the presence of isopropanol and a peroxide; followed by dehydration; (C) a normal commercial polyethylene defined by the small shaded rectangular band of Figure 4; in such weight proportions so that the average composition of said initial reactants lies approximately within the parallelogram A, B, C, D, of the accompanying drawing, Figure 1; said oxidation comprising oxidizing with an oxygen-containing gas in presence of not over 2% of a conventional oxidation-promoting catalyst at a temperature above 212 F. within the range of about 240 F. to 300 F. for a period of time of about 55 to about 75 hours in gas flow rate to cause formation of (a) hydroxyl containing molecules; (12) carboxyl containing molecules; followed by (c) esterification, and (d) subsequent reactions including at least one of the following, alcoholysis and ester-interchange; said resultant product having an acid number of not less than 12, and not over 35; and a saponification number of not less than 35 and not over 90; and having a combined oxygen content of not less than 2% and not over 7%.

4. The product obtained by the process defined in claim 2.

5. The process of claim 3 with the proviso that the oxidation catalyst be a member selected from the class consisting of a wax soluble organic salt of cobalt, a wax soluble organic salt of manganese and potassium permanganate, and with the further proviso that the amount of said catalyst be not over 1% by weight of the oxidation susceptible mixture.

6. The product obtained by the process defined in claim 5.

7. The process of oxidizing a three-component mixture consisting of (A) refined tank bottom-derived microcrystalline wax having a carbon atom range of approximately 35 to 100; said wax being characterized by the following characteristics; (aa) oxidation-susceptible in conventional gaseous oxygen-containing oxidation procedure; (bb) immiscible with polystyrene of molecular weight range 5,000 to 10,000 at approximately 160 C., and (cc) has not been rendered oxidation susceptible by subjecting to treatment with a member of the class consisting of a metallic halide, hydrochloric acid and chlorinated hydrocarbon; (B) a low molal polyethylene having a molecular weight of approximately 200; said polyethylene being free of oxygenated terminal groups, said polyethylene being produced by polymerizing ethylene under 425-475 atmospheres at temperatures between 140-200 C. in the presence of isopropanol and a peroxide; followed by dehydration; (C) a normal commercialpolyethylene defined by the small shaded rectangular band of Figure 4; in such weight proportions so that the average composition of said initial reactants lies approximately within the parallelogram A, B, C, D, of the accompanying drawing, Figure 1; said oxidation comprising oxidizing with air in presence of not over 1% of a member selected from the class consisting of cobalt naphthenate, and manganese naphthenate at a temperature above 212 F. within the range of about 240 F. to 300 F. for a period of time of about to about hours in gas flow rate to cause formation of (a) hydroxyl containing molecules; (b) carboxyl containing molecules; followed by (c) esterification, and (d) subsequent reactions including at least one of the following, alcoholysis and ester-interchange; said resultant product having an acid number of not less than 12, and not over 35; and a saponification number of not less than 35, and not over and having a combined oxygen content of not less than 2% and not over 7%.

8. The product obtained by the process defined in claim 7.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,426,248 Sugarman Aug. 26, 1947 2,471,102 Fish May 24, 1949 2,504,400 Erchak Apr. 18, 1950 2,601,109 Fish June 17, 1952 2,698,309 Thwaites et al Dec. 28, 1954 FOREIGN PATENTS 581,279 Great Britain Oct. 7, 1946 

1. THE PROCESS OF OXIDIZING A THREE-COMPONENT MIXTURE CONSISTING OF (A) REFINED TANK BOTTOM-DERIVED MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX HAVING A CARBON ATOM RANGE OF APPROXIMATELY 35 TO 100; SAID WAX BEING CHARACTERIZED BY THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS; (AA) OXIDATION SUSCEPTIBLE IN CONVENTIONAL GASEOUS OXYGEN-CONTAINING OXIDATION PROCEDURE; (BB) IMMISCIBLE WITH POLYSTYRENE OF MOLECULAR WEIGHT RANGE 5,000 TO 10,000 AT APPROXIMATELY 160* C., AND (CC) HAS NOT BEEN RENDERED OXIDATION SUSCEPTIBLE BY SUBJECTING TO TREATMENT WITH A MEMBER OF THE CLASS CONSISTING OF A METALLIC HALIDE, HYDROCHLORIC ACID AND CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON; (B) A LOW MOLAL POLYETHYLENE HAVING A MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF APPROXIMATELY 2000; SAID POLYETHYLENE BEING FREE OF OXYGENATED TERMINAL GROUPS, SAID POLYETHYLENE BEING PRODUCED BY POLYMERIZING ETHYLENE UNDER 425-200* C. ATMOSPHERES AT TEMPERATURES BETWEEN 140-200* C. IN THE PRESENCE OF ISOPROPANOL AND A PEROXIDE; FOLLOWED BY DEHYDRATION; (C) A NORMAL COMMERCIAL POLYETHYLENE DEFINED BY THE SMALL SHADED RECTANGULAR BAND OF FIGURE 4; IN SAID WEIGHT PROPORTIONS SO THAT THE AVERAGE COMPOSITION OF SAID INITIAL REACTANTS LIES APPROXIMATELY WITHIN THE PARALLELOGRAM A, B, C, D, OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWING FIGURE 1; SAID OXIDATION COMPRISING OXIDIZ- 